Risk factors for orbital implant exposure after evisceration: A case control study of 93 patients

Purpose: The study aims to analyze risk factors for exposure of orbital implants after evisceration by comparison of patients with and without exposure of implants. Methods: This is a case control study in retrospective interventional case series; Group A- implant exposures after evisceration, Group B - Patients on follow up after evisceration with implant, without exposure, with matched duration of follow up. The sample size is calculated for a power of 80. Results: Group A comprised 32 sockets with implant exposure, presenting at median 18 months after surgery; Group B included 61 eviscerated sockets, without implant exposure, with follow up median 36 months. Odds Ratio (OR) was calculated; infected eyes -OR 1.3, P = 0.6; phthisical eye - OR 1.4, P = 0.43; multiple prior surgeries- OR 1.55, P = 0.33. Group A had 59.3% porous implants, Group B 55.7%, - OR 1.3, P = 0.5. Mean implant size in Group A 19.06 mm, Group B 18.78 mm- showed no statistical difference. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed no significant risk factor for exposure. Surgeon factor was not analyzed since there were multiple surgeons. Conclusion: This is the first study with calculated sample size, comparing implant exposure patients to a control group. Porous implant material, presence of infection, phthisical scleral shell, and prior surgery showed higher trend of exposure (Odds ratio >1), but none was conclusive. Larger size of implant was not a risk factor for exposure. Eliminating the role of several factors in implant exposure allows the surgeon to make better surgical choices: such as place an implant of appropriate size, of a material of surgeon's choice, and do primary placement of implant in a patient with evisceration post-corneal ulcer or endophthalmitis. A hypothesis and a recommendation is that meticulous attention be paid to surgical technique.

Pivotal Role of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography for Detecting Iatrogenic Aortic Regurgitation due to Cardiac Catheterization

No abstract available.

Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Paradoxical Low Flow, Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prior studies indicate that up to 35% of cases of severe aortic stenosis (AS) have paradoxical low flow, low gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, error in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter may lead to misclassification. Herein, we determined whether measurement of LVOT diameter by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) results in reclassification of cases to non-severe AS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with severe AS with aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm2 by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within 6 months were studied. Paradoxical low flow, low gradient was defined as mean Doppler gradient (MG) <40 mm Hg and stroke volume index (SVI) ≤35 mL/m². Preserved LVEF was defined as ≥0.50. RESULTS: Among 108 patients, 12 (15%) had paradoxical low flow, low gradient severe AS despite preserved LVEF based on TTE measurement. When LVOT diameter by TEE in 2D was used, only 5 (6.3%) patients had low flow, low gradient severe AS (p<0.001). Coefficients of variability for intraobserver and interobserver measurement of LVOT were <10%. However, the limits of agreement between TTE and TEE measurement of LVOT ranged from 0.43 cm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36 to 0.5) to -0.31 cm (95% CI: -0.38 to -0.23). CONCLUSION: TEE measured LVOT diameter may result in reclassification to moderate AS in some patients due to low prevalence of true paradoxical low flow, low gradient (PLFLG) severe AS.

Effect of Mitral Inflow Pattern on Diagnosis of Severe Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Chronic Organic Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND: To determine sensitivity and specificity of E wave velocity in patients with severe chronic organic mitral regurgitation (MR) and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and to evaluate prevalence of A wave dominance in patients with severe MR. METHODS: We compared 35 patients with quantified severe, chronic, quantified, organic MR due to flail/prolapsed leaflets who had reparative surgery with 35 age-matched control subjects. Exclusion criteria: EF < 60%, atrial fibrillation, and more than mild aortic regurgitation. RESULTS: Mean [standard deviation (SD)] age [70 (8) years vs. 69 (8) years; p = 0.94] and mean (SD) EF [66% (6%) vs. 65% (4%); p = 0.43] were not different between the two groups. Mean (SD) E wave velocity was greater in case patients than control subjects [1.2 (0.3) m/sec vs. 0.7 (0.15) m/sec; p < 0.001]. However, E wave velocity of 1.2 m/sec had a sensitivity of only 57% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41-7 and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 90-100%) in identifying severe MR. E wave velocity of 0.9 m/sec had a more optimal combined sensitivity (89%; 95% CI, 74-95%) and specificity (86%; 95% CI, 71-94%). A wave dominance was seen in 18% of case patients and 66% of control subjects (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: E wave velocity of 1.2 m/sec is specific not sensitive for severe organic MR; E wave velocity of 0.9 m/sec has better sensitivity and specificity. A wave dominance pattern alone cannot exclude patients with severe organic MR. Our findings highlight the importance of a comprehensive echocardiographic exam rather than relying on a few Doppler parameters in diagnosing MR.

Fact-finding Survey of Nosocomial Infection Control in Hospitals in Kathmandu, Nepal—A Basis for Improvement

The purpose of this study was to investigate the actual conditions of nosocomial infection control in Kathmandu City, Nepal as a basis for the possible contribution to its improvement. The survey was conducted at 17 hospitals and the methods included a questionnaire, site visits and interviews. Nine hospitals had manuals on nosocomial infection control, and seven had an infection control committee (ICC). The number of hospitals that met the required amount of personal protective equipment preparation was as follows: gowns (13), gloves (13), surgical masks (12). Six hospitals had carried out in-service training over the past one year, but seven hospitals responded that no staff had been trained. Eight hospitals were conducting surveillance based on the results of bacteriological testing. The major problems included inadequate management of ICC, insufficient training opportunities for hospital staff, and lack of essential equipment. Moreover, increasing bacterial resistance to antibiotics was recognized as a growing issue. In comparison with the results conducted in 2003 targeting five governmental hospitals, a steady improvement was observed, but further improvements are needed in terms of the provision of high quality medical care. Particularly, dissemination of appropriate manuals, enhancement of basic techniques, and strengthening of the infection control system should be given priority.

Sustained hypertension in children.

OBJECTIVE: To study the etiology and clinical profile of children with sustained hypertension. DESIGN: Retrospective hospital-based study. SETTING: Tertiary care, referral center. SUBJECTS: 246 children with sustained hypertension presenting between January 1983 and December 1996. RESULTS: The mean age at presentation was 8.2+/-3.9 yr; range 2 months-16 yr. There were 180 boys. An underlying cause for hypertension was identified in 242 (98.4%); 4 patients were considered to have essential hypertension. The chief causes included chronic glomerulonephritis (GN) in 121 (49.2%), obstructive uropathy in 39 (15.8%), reflux nephropathy in 30 (12.2%), thrombotic microangiopathy in 15 (6.1%) and renovascular disease in 14 (5.7%). Takayasu's disease was the most common cause of renovascular hypertension. Coarctation of aorta was the commonest cause of hypertension in infancy, being present in 53.3% of cases. In 198 subjects (80.5%) hypertension was detected as a feature of a known underlying disease. Thirty-five patients however, presented for the first time with complications of severe hypertension, including congestive cardiac failure in 21 and encephalopathy in 23. Thirteen patients presented with nonspecific symptoms and hypertension was detected on clinical examination. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with sustained hypertension have an underlying etiology. A significant proportion of patients with renovascular and endocrine conditions may present, for the first time, with complications of hypertension.

Pulse corticosteroid therapy with methylprednisolone or dexamethasone.

Intravenous pulse steroid therapy consists of administration of supraphysiological doses of glucocorticoids. It is useful in conditions where rapid immunosuppression and antiinflammatory effect is desired, as in systemic lupus erythematosus, pemphigus, renal transplantation, steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome and crescentic glomerulonephritis. This therapy may be associated with significant adverse reactions including hypertension, arrhythmias, hypokalemia, psychosis and infections. High dose steroid therapy should therefore be used in selected cases and under careful supervision. The drug most widely used for this treatment is methylprednisolone. However, in view of its easy availability and cost, dexamethasone has been often used in India for the above conditions. While there are no controlled studies comparing the two drugs, it appears that the two drugs may be similar in efficacy. Patients requiring high dose intravenous steroid therapy may be treated effectively with either methylprednisolone or dexamethasone.